Search for: "Sells v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 15,578
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 7:23 am
The case challenges South Dakota’s application of its sales tax to internet retailers who sell into South Dakota but have no property or employees in the state. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 8:25 am
In Chase v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:10 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:50 am
The Court then discussed the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Tanner v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:03 am
Additional Resources: Texas v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:23 am
In Bellikoff v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 1:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 4:43 am
Frosty Treats Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 7:05 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC18369 - State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
The State is not petitioning the court to order defendants to sell cake. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 10:43 am
This is consistent with the statutory language which only requires that the property had been subject to state sales tax jurisdiction of the selling party, regardless of whether tax had been paid. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 4:15 am
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Defendant - and - United States Of America, Intervenor Defendants (Opinion, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 23-CV-1506) DOJ RELEASES St. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
The State has filed the final brief in the "ceded lands" case, Hawaii v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 4:28 am
A casino jackpot prize was the subject of the dispute in Stone Street Asset Trust v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 8:40 am
Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 5:00 am
Section 17043 reads: It is unlawful for any person engaged in business within this State to sell any article or product at less than the cost thereof to such vendor, or to give away any article or product, for the purpose of injuring competitors or destroying competition. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 11:20 am
On June 16, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
