Search for: "Singer v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 964
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am
The High Court decision (Mills & Ors v HSBC Trustee (C.I.) [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 2:02 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:08 pm
In 2009, singers Lily Allen and Amy Winehouse both took out similar injunctions. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
This is hardly an unprecedented state of affairs. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
The facts of Fagan v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
See also the commentary on A 99 in Singer/Stauder, 5th edition, 2010, at point 58 “Im Gegensatz zum Patentinhaber hat der Einsprechende keine materiellrechtliche, sondern nur eine verfahrensrechtliche Rechtsposition. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:14 pm
With the scope being limited to the premises stated above, decisions of the SC in the matter of Bhatia International , Citation Infowares, Dozco v Doosan; Videocon v Union of India and Gujarat HC’s decision in Hardy Oil are analysed below. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:53 pm
Allen writes about "Associational Privacy and the First Amendment: NAACP v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am
Comerford, 49 A.D.2d 818 [1975]; Singer v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 8:03 am
NTPC v Singer states that in the absence of an express choice, the substantive law of arbitration would be the same as that of the contract. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:38 am
In Sonatrach Petroleum v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:20 am
’” Id. at 571 (quoting Singer v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:54 pm
The end result in Flannery v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm
The key decision is Walz v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 2:39 am
Co., LLC v Melvin, 33 AD3d 355, 357 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 12:42 pm
The United States Constitution does not mention a right of privacy. [read post]
