Search for: "Sioux" Results 741 - 760 of 1,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2014, 8:00 am by David A. Wolf
You can read more about this story at Day Care Provider Charged in Accidental Death of Child -Sioux City, South Dakota. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 3:30 am
Motorcyclist Tommy Little, 60 years old at the time, was driving his Harley north on Westport Avenue near Sioux Falls on July 25, 2009. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:05 am by Greg Guedel
Associated Press Timothy Williams of the NY Times reports that forty years after the siege at Wounded Knee by members of the American Indian Movement, the Oglala Sioux tribe has demanded that the federal government reopen dozens of cases it says the F.B.I. may have mishandled decades ago. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:59 am by Steve Hall
The Sioux Falls Argus Leader reports, "Moeller questions source of lethal drug. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 8:52 am by Native American Rights Fund
(Inter Partes Review; Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Patent Law) Oglala Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:03 am by Harry Cole
Nearby KSFY-TV, in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, dutifully broke into its regular programming to get the word out. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 2:07 pm by David Jensen
” Sanford called his physician at Sanford Health in Sioux Falls, S.D., who launched the facility's emergency plane. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 4:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
It uses the autobiographical work of an ordinary Sioux woman to provide a narrative lens to the creation of the Sioux claim to the Black Hills. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
He died at the job site and worked for Certified Testing Services, Inc. of Sioux City. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
He died at the job site and worked for Certified Testing Services, Inc. of Sioux City. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:32 am by Kate Fort
Brief in Support of First Motion (July 2014) Statement of Undisputed Facts (First Motion) As a result of the fact that (a) Defendants allowed no testimony at 48-hour hearings, (b) Defendants allowed no cross-examination at 48-hour hearings, (c) often the only questions asked of the parents in a 48-hour hearing were for purposes of identification and to see if they understood their rights, and (d) Defendants never conducted the inquiries required by 25 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Kate Fort
This filing is part of the ICWA class action case in South Dakota over the interpretation of 25 USC 1922 (emergency jurisdiction): The third reason why this Court’s ruling on § 1922 has been inoperative is because the State’s Attorney for Pennington County, Defendant Mark Vargo, and the person Mr. [read post]