Search for: "Small v. State"
Results 741 - 760
of 15,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 6:05 pm
The Case of Navarette v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 6:51 am
United States, 167 Fed. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:20 am
Id. at 18 (quoting Hines v. [read post]
26 Jan 2021, 10:21 am
§411(a); Fourth Estate Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:22 am
Vidal v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:20 am
In Skinner v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:49 pm
Perhaps most importantly, the document contains state-by-state links to organizations working on the ground to preserve some small amount of bodily autonomy for people in this country. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 12:50 pm
Thank goodness that Maine is a relatively small state, as its Law Court seems to have a boundless appetite for finding insurance coverage.In the latest defeat for insurers, the court ruled in Ryder v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
This is not just a small burden but a substantial one. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:25 am
Additional Resources: Uriell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:33 am
It could however have easily been more important, given the very small differences that often make all the difference, particularly in pharma patents. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 10:01 am
The case: Mims v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
No Density Bonus for this Coastal Project In Kalnel Gardens, LLC v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 12:00 pm
No Density Bonus for this Coastal Project In Kalnel Gardens, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:22 am
In Hayes v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 5:00 pm
Join us for a half hour on the 5-4 SCOTUS decision in Knick v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:29 am
”), and because a statute trumps over an inconsistent regulation, see Farrell v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
