Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions Criminal Cases"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,723
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2016, 8:00 am
Criminal courts require “proof beyond a reasonable doubt” for a guilty verdict while the civil courts require only that something “is more likely to be true than not true” for a verdict (See California Civil Jury Instructions 200). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-41959 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm
The Court outlined the reasonableness standard for determining the scope of consent. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 3:14 pm
The Court outlined the reasonableness standard for determining the scope of consent. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 12:59 pm
– Dallas Justice Blog __________________ For more information on pre-arrest criminal defense in Texas see our web resources page or visit Michael Lowe’s Case Results. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 3:23 pm
"Our office holds itself to a standard that exceeds that required by law, and for that reason I agreed that she should receive a new trial," Skurka said. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:52 am
The habeas court recited the following facts with respect to the jury tampering: `On the evening of October 4, 2007, while the petitioner's criminal jury trial was underway, several jurors assigned to the case received telephone calls at their residences from a telephone number identified on their respective caller identification systems as originating from Kate's Paperie, a business establishment in Greenwich, Connecticut. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:39 am
Perfection is an impossible standard in a system that seeks to achieve justice and fairness. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:39 am
Perfection is an impossible standard in a system that seeks to achieve justice and fairness. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:35 am
In its jury instructions, the district court stated, in relevant part:`You may not communicate about this case before reaching your verdict. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) statutory interpretation cases have been in Fashion in recent Terms, and Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:21 am
If you accept the premise of the jury's verdict — that the jury found that the Hammonds maliciously burned government land — then the case does not stand out. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:57 am
Where, as here, the juvenile court applies the incorrect legal standard, we may decline to engage in substantial evidence review and instead remand to allow the juvenile court to apply the correct legal standard. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
The jury convicted her on both charges and the trial judge sentenced her totwo years on each count of unlawful conduct toward a child, to run concurrently. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 4:07 pm
The case was decided on the issue of the jury direction in the context of criminal law. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 12:56 pm
” Sometimes it’s hard to tell the difference between negligent operation and gross negligent operation, but even mere inattention can suffice for grossly negligent.In this case, the court instructed the jury that the State needed to show that Defendant “disregarded a risk of injury or death” and the State rose to that challenge. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 2006) (approving jury instruction based on Restatement §908).District of Columbia: Destefano v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am
As numerous royal instructions to Sheriffs of the era indicate, these armed gangs prevented the monarch’s courts from functioning in many places, and attacked jurors who were traveling to perform jury service. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 11:37 am
The Criminal Justice Standards Commission shall create a policy. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 11:37 am
The Criminal Justice Standards Commission shall create a policy. [read post]
