Search for: "State of California v. Superior Court"
Results 741 - 760
of 3,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2011, 1:58 pm
Superior Court (review granted Oct. 22, 2008 (Brinker) and Brinkley v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
Separately, Prager refiled the state law claims in California state court. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 9:52 am
Superior Court. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 8:43 am
Medical Board of California, No. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:42 pm
(Gade v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:00 am
Superior Court (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 1462.) [read post]
2 Jul 2006, 8:43 pm
Unlike the recent California Court of Appeal decision in O'Grady v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:06 am
In a case fashioned after the California Supreme Court's decision in Pineda v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 7:57 am
In a case fashioned after the California Supreme Court's decision in Pineda v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
Court" and then published this analysis: REST BREAK AND MEAL PERIOD CLAIMS AFTER MURPHY V. [read post]
27 May 2009, 5:18 pm
Last month, Judge Freedman in Alameda County Superior Court ruled that the State was required to list all the chemicals identified by reference in Labor Code sections 6382(b)(1) and 6382(d). [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:22 am
The trial court stated recognition of the IIEI tort in the State of California was a matter for an appellate court and dismissed Beckwith's entire complaint without leave to amend. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Vincent de Fontbrune v. Alan Wofsy, Docket No. 19-16913
5 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
(…) Before Wofsy filed the Review Proceeding, though, Sicre de Fontbrune brought the instant action in the Superior Court of California in Alameda County in November of 2013, seeking recognition of the astreinte judgment. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 2:16 pm
Superior Court, 51 Cal. 4th 310 (2011). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:23 pm
In a recent California Court of Appeals opinion, Hoffman v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:37 am
Superior Court (Hohnbaum). [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 10:39 am
AB 5: Independent Contractors AB 5 codifies California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:38 am
Superior Court, the California Supreme Court adopted a new test, called the “ABC” test, for evaluating whether workers are properly classified as independent contractors. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:05 am
Our bad.The second, issued minutes later, in State Farm v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 6:04 am
Superior Court [read post]
