Search for: "State of Delaware v. Wells." Results 741 - 760 of 2,050
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2017, 10:16 am by Amy Howe
Other provisions, however, are less well known – for example, the 10th Amendment, which provides that the “powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:13 am by Peter Mahler
” Nonetheless, the idea that the plaintiffs had no means to protect their economic interest in the LLC did not sit well with the judge. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:11 pm by Ezra Rosser
Delaware, although a part of the Union, was a slave state, and after the Civil War, a Jim Crow state. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 1:40 pm by Francis Pileggi
  The defendant-directors moved to dismiss based on failure to state a claim for relief, as well as failure to plead demand futility. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 6:32 am by Charles B. Jimerson, Esq.
Most states—including, Delaware and Florida—give shareholders who dissent from the approval of a fundamental transaction the right to receive the fair value of their shares. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 5:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I have detailed on this blog (most recently here), due to two Delaware court decisions — the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Corwin v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Finally, Professor Brian JM Quinn of the Boston College Law School filed an interesting amicus brief in Koshy in which he urged the court to take guidance from the Delaware Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shawe v Elting authorizing a sale of the highly profitable TransPerfect company based on the irreconcilable deadlock between its two owners. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
After all, the dictionaries tell us that deadlock is a state of impasse or inability to progress when two opposing factions with equal control can’t come to agreement on something. [read post]