Search for: "State of Georgia v. United States" Results 741 - 760 of 2,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2012, 6:36 am by Sheldon Toplitt
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit last week in LFP Publishing Group d/b/a Hustler Magazine v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 6:58 am by Matt Cooper
Though President Biden has been inaugurated as the 46th President of the United States, a handful of Presidential election cases remain pending at the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:27 am
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979) (government invited public recreational boaters to enter a private lagoon) (a case litigated by my Damon Key colleagues Charlie Bocken and Diane Hastert, by the way), Loretto v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:32 am by Charles Chevalier
The Federal Circuit recently reversed the Northern District of Georgia’s judgment of unenforceability based on inequitable conduct, in Outside The Box Innovations, LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Although Willis, acting for Fulton County and the state of Georgia, has no power to grant Powell or Chesebro any kind of immunity against federal prosecution, pursuant to the SCOTUS decisions in Murphy v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 am
Nitelites Franchise Systems (Order dated January 4, 2007) United States District Judge Pannell of the Northern District of Georgia denying defendants' motion for summary judgment as to the generic nature of the term "nite lites. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:21 pm by Daniel Harawa
Wooden pleaded guilty to 10 counts of burglary in Georgia state court and served an eight-year sentence. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:32 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
The Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals recently, in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:29 am
First, the United States Supreme Court has held that even people in custody have First Amendment rights, although restrictions on those rights are scrutinized under a low standard. . . [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 9:55 am by Beth Graham
  In addition, the company also claims the lower court’s decision went against established United States Supreme Court precedent. [read post]