Search for: "State of New York, et al."
Results 741 - 760
of 3,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 2:04 am
In Everest National Insurance Company, et al. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Tettamanti, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Sewell etc., et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Sewell etc., et al., Respondents-Respondents. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:00 am
Auth. v New York State Pub. [read post]
10 May 2012, 2:21 pm
Schneider of Fishers, Indiana and Jafarikal Corporation of Rosedale, New York infringed trademark. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:24 am
Facts: This case (Griffith et al v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:55 am
New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., NY Slip Op 08972 (1st Dept. 2008). [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:00 pm
., et al., Petitioners v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:42 am
Roberts, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:29 am
In Loper Bright Enterprises et al v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
Spitzer et al. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 8:31 pm
Schoeps, et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Federal District Court granted the motion to dismiss Plaintiff's action alleging violations of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973* and related state and municipal laws submitted by the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, et. al. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Federal District Court granted the motion to dismiss Plaintiff's action alleging violations of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973* and related state and municipal laws submitted by the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, et. al. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 6:00 am
ZAYAS, JJ. 2018-03024 (Index No. 3841/17) In the Matter of Lawrence Union Free School District, petitioner/cross respondent, v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, respondent/cross petitioner, et al., respondent. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:17 pm
Of the WARF patents, Andrew Pollack of the New York Times reported:The United States Patent and Trademark Office has made a preliminary decision to revoke fundamental patents on human embryonic stem cells that some scientists and consumer groups say have impeded research into a promising new field. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:42 am
A new decision from the United States District Court in Illinois, Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]