Search for: "State v Hooks"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2016, 5:48 pm
The Middle District of Alabama case Martin v. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 7:41 am
” One professor who was a former clerk “gave no examples” in stating that Scalia followed his principles. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:02 am
Hooks, decided earlier this year: I reluctantly concur, based on the Texas Supreme Court's holding in BP America Production Co. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 8:31 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm
In Diop v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:23 am
As a result, if the Supreme Court adopts the activity/inactivity distinction, it seems likely that future Congresses will use whatever hook the Supreme Court says is required — and not one iota more — to make sure their laws pass judicial muster.We saw this with Congress’s reaction to United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:14 am
Again that was like leaning into a left hook - this particular punch being called Buckman. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:05 am
ShareWednesday’s unanimous decision in Bartenwerfer v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:29 pm
The Court’s opinion in Steagald v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 2:29 pm
The Court’s opinion in Steagald v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:56 am
An interesting, but unsurprising, decision in Todd v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
The case is State of Texas v. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
A common one is the absence of knowledge of the wrongdoing, as demonstrated in the case of L’Oréal SA v eBay International AG, where the High Court stated that eBay “did not know that such infringements had occurred and were likely to continue to occur” and this (amongst other factors) were not enough to make eBay liable as joint tortfeasors. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:31 am
But in Barnes v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:50 am
In Stresscon Corp. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2015, 11:13 am
I was hooked. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:42 am
When Orin Kerr noted the unusual opinion out of Fourth District Court of Appeals in Florida in Ruiz v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
" Don Zimmerman, a Texas taxpayer filed suit, and argued that Austin is violating this state law. [read post]