Search for: "State v Mark Brown"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP ADR Blog) David Brown discusses global growth in IP (IP Solutions) Global - Trade Marks / Brands How to respond to cease and desist orders from trademark owners (IP ADR Blog) Artists and brands – ad-supported CD releases (IP finance) The questionable notion of the national brand (IP finance) Global - Patents Seeing the forrest: considering worldwide patent trends (Patently-O) PCT v 2.0 on the anvil? [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
" To support this, he relied on Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
Inforrm had daily case reports (thank you to Media Lawyer), as follows: Case Report, Sir Cliff Richard v BBC, Day 3, Raid information “came from police source” – Media Lawyer Case Report, Sir Cliff Richard v BBC, Day 4, Sir Cliff seemed “utterly distraught” Case Report, Sir Cliff Richard v BBC, Day 5, Sir Cliff “Faced Crisis Situation”, Reporter “Guessed the Singer’s Name” – Media Lawyer Case… [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm
Kelsi Brown Corkran, for Roxanne Torres, and Mark Standridge, for officers (Art Lien) Kelsi Corkran argued on behalf of Roxanne Torres, a New Mexico woman who was shot twice by state police before driving away from the scene. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
United States. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Marking with expired patent sufficient for pleading intent: Simonian v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
As stated in Moore’s Federal Practice, “The identity of class members must be ascertainable by reference to objective criteria. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am
They pointed out that in the recent case of Google v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
US Trademarks USTrademarkExchange.com: New web service for sale of registered trade marks (IP finance) Think outside the trademark box – staying on top of recent developments in other areas of IP law can help trade mark owners be more strategic in trying cases (Managing Intellectual Property) US Trade Marks – Decisions Court of Appeal for District of Columbia affirms laches ruling dismissing REDSKINS cancellation: Pro-Football… [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 7:03 am
” Defendants didn’t like Rogers, attacking its inflexibility, but the Ninth Circuit thinks that’s the point (quoting Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 5:45 am
After diagnosis and treatment, Defendant claims that he began to exhibit marked improvement in functioning. . . .U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
Jerry Brown’s plans to close the state’s massive budget deficit,” but also it will affect other states — twenty-two of which joined California’s appeal — that “have indicated an interest in making similar cutbacks. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am
Jerry Brown’s plans to close the state’s massive budget deficit,” but also it will affect other states — twenty-two of which joined California’s appeal — that “have indicated an interest in making similar cutbacks. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
Sept. 9, Dowling, J.).Whether other trial court judges from around the commonwealth will rule in a similar fashion or will, instead, apply the same rule of discovery pertaining to video surveillance remains to be seen.Claims of Privileged Information in DiscoveryIn its decision in the case Brown v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 7:14 pm
” The case cite is CytoSport, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
” In Reynolds v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
deals with the issues The trial in the case of Mark Lewis Law Ltd v Taylor Hampton Ltd began this week before Moulder J. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
