Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,317
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Borough of Palisades Park, 899 F. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 8:00 am
Borough of Palisades Park, 899 F. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am
Borough of Mt. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 11:08 pm
The unconstitutional trial that President Trump was subjected to occurred in the most liberal borough, of the most liberal city, of one of the most liberal States in the country. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:37 am
The Third Circuit Court rejected that argument in a case growing out of a running feud between Duryea’s Borough Council and the local chief of police (Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd & Ors, heard 23 July 2020 Allykhan v Abdool (Mauritius), heard 23 July 2020 Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd v Nautical Challenge Ltd, heard 5-6 October 2020… [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:03 am
Der v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
3 May 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Manchester Building Society (Appellant) v Grant Thornton UK LLP (Respondent), heard 13-14 October 2020 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others… [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 1:55 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 20/10/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery heard 7th December 2021 Stanford… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
The term breached must be a term of the tenancy, not a 'personal obligation' (Paddington Churches Housing Association v Boateng 1999 Legal Action 27). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 3:19 pm
The term breached must be a term of the tenancy, not a 'personal obligation' (Paddington Churches Housing Association v Boateng 1999 Legal Action 27). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:33 am
The state’s strongest reaction may be seen in Gallenthin Realty Dev., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
Entertainment Merchants Ass’n (challenging, on First Amendment grounds, a California state ban on the sale of violent video games to minors) and Snyder v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
See Delaware State Coll. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:06 am
Ladele v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Two rulings by state courts illustrate this point, Croman v City University of New York, 277 AD2d 185, and Parisi v NYC Housing Authority, Appellate Division, First Department, 269 AD2d 210. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 11:28 am
” The Court reminded itself of the high threshold for a mandatory, rather than prohibitory injunction, of a ‘strong prima facie case’, via Francis V Kensington and Chelsea Royal London Borough Council [2003] 1 WLR 2248, then went on to the criteria for the exercise of the discretion to accommodate pending appeal in R v Camden London Borough Council ex parte Mohammed [1997] 30 HLR 315. [read post]
