Search for: "State v. Branch" Results 741 - 760 of 6,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 6:16 pm
On July 18, 2007, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia rejected the United States Government's interpretation of the Treaty of Amity between the United States and Iran, and affirmed an earlier decision allowing American plaintiffs to sue Iran in U.S. courts under Article IV(2) of the Treaty: McKesson Corp. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 6:38 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Earlier this year, the Florida State legislature approved a settlement for $3.5 million with the family of a teenager who was injured when a branch of a city-owned tree fell on top of him. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 6:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
Claiming exempt volunteer firefighter status for the purposes of Civil Service Law §75.1(b)Serviss v Incorporated Vil. of Floral Park, 2018 NY Slip Op 05597, Appellate Division, Second Department§75.1 of the Civil Service Laws generally bars the termination of a tenured officer or employee in the Competitive Class of Classified Service of the State or a political subdivision of the State "except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon… [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:22 pm by Amy Howe
” And Don Verrilli, arguing on behalf of North Carolina executive-branch officials, suggested a possible test, which he characterized as the “best distillation” of Rehnquist’s concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:19 am
Supreme Court.Yesterday the Court agreed to review a decision below in M.B.Z. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:43 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
The appeals court agreed with Father, stating that the trial court erred in their sua sponte order for civil contempt. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 11:01 am by Phillips & Associates
The bill’s memo states that the law would establish the State of New York as the employer of “anyone serving in the executive, judiciary, and legislative branches, including the staff of elected officials or judges. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by John C. Coffee, Jr.
This term, the Court has limited not only agencies and the Executive branch, but also Congress – thereby allocating the real authority to decide to itself. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:46 am by Russ Bensing
Back in June, in State v. [read post]