Search for: "State v. Brown" Results 741 - 760 of 8,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 2:48 am
Modifying a disciplinary penaltyBrown v Penn Yan CSD, 275 AD2d 931Knight v BOCES, App. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 6:37 am
Jon Murray of the Indianapolis Star reports today on the Indiana Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Richard Brown v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 6:48 pm
  But that he nonetheless appreciates the opening two paragraphs of Justice Currey's opinion:"This case resolves two obscure and previously unaddressed state constitutional issues: Does article I, section 16 of the California Constitution guarantee the right to a jury trial for (1) nominal statutory damages claims, and/or (2) claims for attorneys’ fees, under the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act (CMIA) (Civ. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
  Not enough reasonable suspicion to conduct a Terry stop.There's a lot in the opinion that makes sense; that having a gun is likely lawful in the state, that lots of innocent people (including, perhaps especially, minorities) distrust and may run from the police, etc.But the standard for a Terry stop -- a "brief, investigative detention" -- is low. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:22 am
In yesterday's New York Times, Adam Liptak had this article called "Brown v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:20 am by Scott Bomboy
“This Court cannot countenance a claim by the Governor and Legislature of a State that there is no duty on state officials to obey federal court orders resting on this Court's considered interpretation of the United States Constitution in Brown v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 6:41 pm by Dan Bushell
Brown, (the much publicized suit over the constitutionality of California's Proposition 8) for its lessons in advocacy than for its political issues. [read post]
12 May 2018, 4:56 pm by Schachtman
Browne at 143 (quoting from Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 3:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
However, the Supreme Court in the UK has previously held that the duty to provide a real opportunity for rehabilitation was an ancillary duty in the overall scheme of art 5 and existed throughout the prisoner’s detention (R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66). [read post]