Search for: "State v. CC" Results 741 - 760 of 1,553
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2015, 3:11 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
 Image is courtesy of Flickr user cheb.odegaard under a CC BY 2.0 license. [read post]
At minimum, we will need each shareholder’s legal name, legal address, the state and country of formation, and the state and country of the principal place of business. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm by Sean Hanover
The code relevant code states: (from DC Code 16-803)(2) (A) If a period of at least 5 years has elapsed since the completion of the movant's sentence for a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction in the District of Columbia or for a conviction in any jurisdiction for an offense that involved conduct that would constitute a disqualifying misdemeanor conviction if committed in the District, the conviction shall not disqualify the movant from filing a motion to seal an arrest and related… [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm by familoo
This was followed shortly after by Glos CC v AB on March 2nd. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:15 am
             Part VIII of the MCC was inserted following the judgment in Subramaniam Balaji v State of Tamil Nadu. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 4:23 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
The bottom of the form reports local and state tax information. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
Claimants have challenged State measures including upfront expropriations or mere State regulatory decisions in different industries spanning from the financial sector (Abaclat v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 11:56 am
Claimants have challenged State measures including upfront expropriations or mere State regulatory decisions in different industries spanning from the financial sector (Abaclat v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Settler states: North America, Australia, New Zealand—different process than in postcolonial states. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 3:07 pm by M. Varn Chandola
  However the  courts just recently reinforced this very questionable notion of privacy in State v. [read post]