Search for: "State v. Cross" Results 741 - 760 of 14,900
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2012, 11:38 am by Poppy Weston-Davies, Olswang LLP
The scheme ran into trouble when the Attorney General of Missouri issued proceedings against the scheme under the state’s consumer protection legislation, and it soon became clear that other similar proceedings would inevitably follow. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 11:12 am by Lydia Estep
The panel stated that neither compulsory process nor cross-examination is dispositive in determining the preclusive effect of an administrative decision. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:32 pm
Rocky Sharwell informed me yesterday that the Florida Supreme Court has just issued a long-awaited decision, State v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:01 pm by Christopher Mathews
Last week, AFCCA heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:55 am
In recent Eighth Circuit case, peer review DNA expert's testimony did not violate the Confrontation Clause since the expert testified and was cross-examined about her own review and conclusions even though she did not conduct the testing, in United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:23 pm by scanner1
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MONTANA, NEW WEST HEALTH SERVICES, MONTANA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION, STATE OF MONTANA, and JOHN DOES 1-100, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]