Search for: "State v. Dakota" Results 741 - 760 of 2,220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2021, 2:20 pm by Unknown
Khouri (Indian Taxation; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Even if Minnesota claimed that pollution emitters in North Dakota were harming the state, Minnesota couldn't hale the North Dakota emitters to court. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by Kate Fort
Hanna and representatives from the States Attorney’s Office and Dakota Plains Legal Services to discuss how this Court’s summary judgment ruling could be implemented in the Seventh Circuit’s 48-hour hearings. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by NARF
(Joinder; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Lutin v Perlberger 2024 NY Slip Op 31879(U) May 29, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 158734/2023Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 2:39 pm by Joseph Koncelik
 These states are subject to a separate preliminary injunction which was issued by the federal district court in North Dakota. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:26 pm by Unknown
United States (Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium; FTCA)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMoyant v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mensch v Calogero 2023 NY Slip Op 33648(U) October 17, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155795/2022Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here. in Jarmuth v Wagner    2022 NY Slip Op 33698(U)  October 28, 2022  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: Index No. 161816/2019 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
United States (Treaty Rights; "Bad Men" Provision) Reges v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am by Amy Howe
More coverage of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Yet the District Court concluded that Appellants could not, as a matter of law, pursue their North Dakota common-law claims against Appellees simply because Appellees involved the United States in their swindle. [read post]