Search for: "State v. EDWARD C."
Results 741 - 760
of 1,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
The Panopticon Blog has a post “Parliaments and the GDPR” concerned the CJEU case, Case C-272/19 VK v Land Hessen (EU:C:2020:535). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
This statement was referred to with approval by Sir Edward Coke in Co Litt 42a (1628), and much the same is stated in Brook’s New Cases (1554/5) pl 462. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
This statement was referred to with approval by Sir Edward Coke in Co Litt 42a (1628), and much the same is stated in Brook’s New Cases (1554/5) pl 462. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:23 am
Rev. 265 (2018) (with Rochelle C. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:52 am
Though the settlement in Toysrus.com v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:07 pm
C. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Emily Watkins, Damon Dawain Edwards, Edward J. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
In addition to this, all state public defender cases are included. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
One example is the conviction he secured in the case of People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:58 pm
Strom Thurmond's Brown v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
The Information Commissioner John Edwards said it is important employees report any suspicious emails, the Guardian reports. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Code §2307.76(c); Howland v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:27 am
In the wake of the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (IPKat post here), second medical use claims have received considerable attention from the IP commentariat. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:17 pm
John V. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
IDEA, Section 601(c). [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 1:26 pm
As ever, SCOTUSBlog has the details on the case, Bank Markazi v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:22 am
§ 1158(b)(2)(C)—but only as long as it uses criteria that are “consistent” with § 1158. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
