Search for: "State v. Favors" Results 741 - 760 of 37,500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2011, 7:30 pm
In Mid 2011 - the Colorado State Legislature enacted a law - House Bill 11-1064, which created a presumption, subject to the State Board of Parole, in favor of granting parole to an inmate who has reached his or her parole eligibility date and who is serving a sentence for certain drug-related crimes, provided that the offender meets other requirements specified in the bill. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 7:00 pm by Dru Stevenson
In a sense, the indirect consequences of Mass v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:31 am by John Diekman
These allegations were sufficient to state the claim.Student note: Plaintiff was not required to show a likelihood of success in the underlying action, but was required only to plead facts from which it could reasonably be inferred that defendant's negligence caused her loss.Case: Polanco v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:12 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida rendered a similar ruling in 2009, Double AA International Investment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 1:20 pm by Phil
In doing so, the Federal Circuit established broad standing for private individuals seeking to pursue qui tam actions for false patent marking on behalf of the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:44 am
It does not require an intent beyond that just stated. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:59 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, March 18, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Dimmett v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:17 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, June 24, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Crespo v. [read post]