Search for: "State v. Folk"
Results 741 - 760
of 3,168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2008, 12:14 pm
But when you flout the authority of an entire state, folks are going to take notice. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:55 am
Thanks again to the folks at Prawfs for allowing me to loiter long enough to post about today's opinion in Bilski v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
I'm fairly confident that what Justice Robie says in this opinion about both the applicable law and the existence of prejudice accurately states the existing doctrine.But should it really be this way? [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
Sure, prior to Shady Grove, some federal courts have looked to state law (e.g., Iorio v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
In Palkon v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 5:58 am
Robert Barnes writes in a lengthy report:The Supreme Court will open the new year with its most politically divisive case since Bush v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
Taylor v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:12 am
And these folks aren’t just talking, they are voting. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 5:43 am
In Delalla v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:22 am
As I mentioned in a prior blog, in Coulter v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:30 am
It looks like his lawyer won the case by writing a good brief.The case is Shaw v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 7:30 pm
by Dennis Crouch Georgia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
§1332.The reason for diversity jurisdiction is that out-of-state residents sued in a plaintiff's home state were thought to be vulnerable to what lawyers call "home cooking" - that local judges would favor local plaintiffs (and their lawyers) over folks from out of state, particularly when those folks are richer than the local folks. [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:13 am
” (Bixby v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:51 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit yesterday issued its opinion in Scroggin v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 10:08 am
On the other hand, given the way Risk handled coverage of the "sovereign immunity issue" in Sistrunk v United States of America I am not at all surprised. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:26 am
Similarly, in Sierra Club v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:44 am
The folks who negotiated NAFTA thought this through. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:19 am
And here’s a brief explanation (more coverage to come): With respect to U.S. v Windsor – the DOMA case with a tax angle – it wasn’t so much about the individual rights of folks to marry but the rights of states to write their own laws defining marriage.. [read post]
