Search for: "State v. German" Results 741 - 760 of 3,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am by Calvin Massey
  While that observation is food for further thought, it isn’t germane to what Yates may mean for King v. [read post]
On 7 May 2024, the BundesPatentGericht (BPatG) found that German patent to be invalid and revoked the German part of the Patent. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 8:27 am by Keith E. Whittington
San Diego State University's actions here are eerily reminiscent of the situation assessed by a federal circuit court in Hardy v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:50 am by Florian Mueller
" On Thursday, the PTAB granted the petition and held all challenged claims unpatentable: Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd., v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
Following the recent CJEU decisions in Case C-617/15(Hummel v Nike, reported in various places including here) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive, reported on this very blawg), the English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor [2018] EWHC 3432 (Ch) has just become available. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
 Merpel has an English version of his interview by Juve, a German review for lawyers, translated into English. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:08 am by Howard Friedman
The press release describes the views of the European Court:the [German] labour court of appeal had confined itself to stating that ... [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Do Italians really got what sharing services among EU Member States is about, she wonders? [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
 PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited  | Loubutin case referred to the CJEU | German court refuses amendments filed on appeal | Italian Sharing Economy Bill | EPO Performance | IP in culinary recipes | Where has the patent troll gone? [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:43 am by Florian Mueller
HTC resorts to failure-of-proof and failure-to-state-actionable-claim types of arguments, which are irrelevant for now because the leading German reference on patent litigation clearly says that all a plaintiff needs to do here to state an actionable claim is to allege that a specified patent claim is infringed by certain accused products. [read post]