Search for: "State v. Grant"
Results 741 - 760
of 68,164
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONR. v New York City Hous. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives) in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
The descriptive account also suggests that the Supreme Court’s decision in Oil States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:37 am
Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:37 am
Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:37 am
Edwards Lifesciences Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
“Foreign person” means anyone that is not a United States citizen, national, or lawful permanent resident; any individual admitted to the United States as a refugee under 8 U.S.C. 1157 or granted asylum under 8 U.S.C. 1158; any entity organized solely under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches); or any person in the United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, in the 2014 case of Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm
By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:28 pm
Lustig v City of Laguna Beach, 2023 WL 6370231 (CD CA 8/10/2023) [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 2:43 pm
In 2022 the Supreme Court of Canada considered the issue of family violence in Barendregt v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:08 pm
" (Article V, Section 8).I'm quite confident that others knew about this quirk in the California pardon scheme, but I didn't. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:05 am
McDaniel v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:34 am
" Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:44 am
The decision had an immediate chilling effect on fertility treatments in the state, prompting Alabama lawmakers to grant civil and criminal immunity to IVF clinics. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
The trial court granted Cheloniidae summary judgment declaring it to be the lawful general partner following the undisputed dissociation of Lionfish LLC as general partner due to Amy’s and Randy’s requests for receivership. [read post]
