Search for: "State v. Hernandez" Results 741 - 760 of 1,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm by John Bellinger
   We point out, inter alia, that extraterritorial application of the ATS in most cases violates the Court’s longstanding proscription (first enunciated in 1897 in Underhill v Hernandez) against allowing U.S. courts to “sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another, done within its own territory. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 am by Joel R. Brandes
The motion stated that the minor children sought to appear in this action through Alex Hernandez as Next Friend. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm by CAPTAIN
  And second, remember that there is a large segment of the membership of the DCBA that has never seen the inside of a State courtroom. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Tobias Thienel
This doctrine holds,in the broadest outline, that English (like U.S.) courts 'will not sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another done within its own territory' (Underhill v Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 252 (1897)) or 'will not adjudicate upon the transactions of foreign sovereign states' (Buttes Gas Oil Co v Hammer (No 3) [1982] AC 888, 931G). [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 11:29 am
Other defendants who’ve been indicted include Dalbert Hernandez, Victor Batista, Roger Lores, Dayan Galarraga, and Dalmis Gonzalez; they all allegedly collected the stolen funds. [read post]