Search for: "State v. Hodge"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
" United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm
Within hours of the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:53 pm
James Obergefell is a plaintiff in Obergefell, et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 8:55 am
Hodges at the center of the constitutional enterprise. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
Hodges (Glen) v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:30 am
Hodges (same sex marriage).The Mississippi Solicitor General said no, invoking two reasons. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:45 am
Lord Briggs gave the main judgment, with which Lord Hodge, Lord Sales and Lord Carloway agree. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
The relevant tax year of assessment was stated to be 2000/2001. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:42 am
Here, I think the case Hodge v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 11:17 am
Apr. 22, 1995); State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 pm
Hodges, citing the equal protection clause stated in the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 pm
Hodges, citing the equal protection clause stated in the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:23 am
Hodges, the 2015 decision that recognized the right to same-sex marriage, or of organizations trying to revisit Griswold v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 10:23 am
Hodges had come from the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:10 pm
Jan Hallmark James Hodges William T. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
See order in Texas v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:55 am
For now, here are quick summaries: THE CITY OF ROUND ROCK, TEXAS AND ROUND ROCK FIRE CHIEF LARRY HODGE v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm
This is a well-known 1955 precedent about regulation of eyeglass prescriptions that permits state regulation based on any hypothetical rationale a state “might” have had in mind, even if there is no indication that the state ever thought about that policy and, instead, a lawyer for the state conjures it for the first time from whole cloth in litigation. [read post]
