Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 741 - 760
of 8,228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
In R (on the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56, [2021] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), the Supreme Court found there was no positive obligation on the state to provide the option of an ‘X’ gender category on passports. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:08 pm
V. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 10:35 am
The country’s failure to fulfill the promise of Gideon v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s statement in Reiter v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
(A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. 17 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:08 am
The Munich court had actually taken an unequivocal position on that question in the Nokia v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:44 am
Article 3(c) of the SPC Regulation states that the product for which an SPC is granted must not have already been the subject of an SPC. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
Firstly, the local licence holder will lose revenue, and therefore motivation to buy a licence next time. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:04 am
Pix Credit HEREThe folks over at the Völkerrechtsblog have posted an excellent essay by Andrew Forde (Visiting Fellow at the Irish Centre for Human Rights at the National University of Ireland, Galway). [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 2:58 am
Both parties have been granted leave to file pleadings until then.Unlike the situation between IP Bridge and OPPO, the IP Bridge v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm
On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down its Continental v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 1:10 am
Chapter V of the Regulation authorizes public sector bodies and Union institutions, agencies or bodies to request access to data from data holders if they demonstrate an “exceptional need” to use the data requested. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 9:44 am
More specifically, the focus is on the risk of complicity in the human rights violations of others (principally states but also other actors (insurgents, agents, That, in turn, can be understood to involve three distinct areas of human rights risks: (1) conflict zone risks; (2) states that may be directly or indirectly involved in the commission of human rights wrongs or in support of states committing these wrongs; and (3) states, other… [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 4:12 am
Fletcher v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:44 am
By contrast, in the United States the government firstly has to go to court and seek an injunction from an impartial judge. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
In McGrain v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 1:06 am
Zigann's 2018 Qualcomm v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 7:49 am
” As proposed, an illiquid fund would be defined as a fund that (i) has a limited life; (ii) does not continuously raise capital; (iii) is not required to redeem interests upon an investor’s request; (iv) has as a predominant operating strategy to return the proceeds from the disposition of investments to investors; (v) has limited opportunities, if any, for investors to withdraw before the termination of the fund; and (vi) does not routinely acquire (directly or indirectly) as… [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 5:45 am
In Walker v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
