Search for: "State v. Hughes"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:22 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court requested supplemental briefing in Jennings v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 7:20 am
The Second Circuit has now recognized another exception to the Faragher affirmative defense: proxy, or alter ego, liability.The case is Townsend v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:09 pm
The case that gave the Justices the greatest difficulty was Perry v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Hall v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 7:05 am
Hughes 17-467 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:53 pm
A recent case concluded in the Circuit Court for the City of Richmond, KnowCampaign v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm
His book, M’Culloch v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
Edwards on behalf of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors, heard 25 Jul 2019. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 12:34 pm
Hughes v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:00 am
United States (drug felony, misdemeanor, facilitate, cellular phone) Dean, Christopher M. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
HUGHES, an individual; and J. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 7:12 am
Here they are in case you missed them:TRADE MARKSKatfriend Marijus Dingilevskis posted on a recent decision of the Lithuanian Supreme Court, which states that even if a trade mark has been registered in the international register for 40 years, this is no guarantee that a subsequent national designation will be also registered.GuestKat Becky Knott commented on the decision of the 2nd Board of Appeal in case R 609/2021-2 [Volkswagen… [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
The UK Supreme Court answered this question in the affirmative earlier this week in its judgment in R v M & Ors [2017] UKSC 58.Issued in the context of an interlocutory appeal in criminal proceedings, this ruling concerned the proper construction of section 92(1) of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:41 am
The case is Hughes v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Speed v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:08 pm
– Hugh Tomlinson QC Case Law: Gulati v MGN Ltd, A landmark decision on the quantum of privacy damages – Hugh Tomlinson QC and Sara Mansoori How to avoid defamation – Steven Price Defamation Act 2013: Does section 1 replace the test of the hypothetical reasonable reader by that of the twitter troll? [read post]
16 Feb 2008, 8:45 am
Hughes (coverage here). [read post]
