Search for: "State v. Investors Security Corporation" Results 741 - 760 of 1,318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Emphasis on Individual Accountability to Protect the Markets To encourage a compliance culture, Associate Director Stacy Bogert stated that the SEC will seek clawbacks of executive compensation under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 304. [read post]
 According to the SEC, in those transactions passive investors made investments of money in a common enterprise in reliance on the efforts of promoters to generate investor profits. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:49 am
 Russian Law Concerning Investment  For economic reforms to flourish and private investors and entrepreneurs to prosper, the legal system must effectively protect private property, defend economic rights against infringement, and establish a secure environment for investment and market relations. [7] In contemplating the accession of the Russian Federation (RF) to the World Trade Organization, a dramatic increase in foreign investment activity is anticipated. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 11:34 am
Todd's paper first argues that paternalism for corporate employees is inevitable because stakeholders will demand it (e.g., to cut health care costs), then engages in a comparative analysis of who should supply it, markets or the state. [read post]
Collectively, if not individually, these destabilizing dynamics will alter the balance of power utterly between directors and activist stockholders, between federal and state regulators, between American and foreign sources of capital, and between models of consensus and contentious corporate governance. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
  After the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
22 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
  The opinion includes a cautionary reflection on the limits of corporate law, at least the law of a single small state, as a lever for the pursuit of pro-social objectives. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As a result of this decision, several states began to enact corporate indemnification statutes.8 In 1967, the State of Delaware passed new indemnification laws specifically authorizing corporations to purchase D&O liability insurance; by 1973, 25 other states had followed Delaware’s lead.9 Until this time, it was unclear if a corporation could legally pay the cost of the individual liability of a director or officer under the… [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:36 am by azatty
Supreme Court’s historic ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]