Search for: "State v. Kelly "
Results 741 - 760
of 1,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2019, 1:54 am
In an op-ed for The Daily Caller, Jake Warner urges the court to review Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:00 am
Stephen Morris and Kelly McDaniel were Ernst & Young employees, the accounting and financial services company. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
ASCAP[12] and Video Pipeline, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:01 pm
Mach Mining v. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 6:08 am
By Kelly McClure In Araujo v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 12:23 pm
 Casale v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
While North Carolina has had its own share of assaults with unusual deadly weapons, see, e.g., State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 2:00 am
While North Carolina has had its own share of assaults with unusual deadly weapons, see, e.g., State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
No. 163 (SCJ, Kelly) at para. 32. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 9:15 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:55 am
" For this proposition Judge Stearns cited his own prior opinion in Kelly v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:16 pm
- Minneapolis lawyer Dan Kelly of Winthrop & Weinstine on the firm's Duets Blog Ten Reasons Chinese Companies Fail In The United States. - Seattle attorney Dan Harris of Harris & Moure on the firm's China Law Blog [read post]
31 May 2017, 10:20 am
However, Secretary Kelly emphasized that the expansion of the ban is “still on the table” and that the DHS will expand the ban “if the intelligence and threat level warrant it. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:09 am
Chris Kelly, Engel v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Murphy v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v ;Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
”7 The statute lists several categories of works which may be protected, including “(1) literary works; ;(2) musical works, including any accompanying words; ;(3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music; ;(4) pantomimes and choreographic works; ;(5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; ;(6) motion pictures and other audiovisual… [read post]
