Search for: "State v. Liberator"
Results 741 - 760
of 7,771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 8:38 am
The court stated: "We therefore hold, liberally construing the statute in favor of Defendant, Elmwood, 295 N.C. at 185, 244 S.E.2d at 678; Laughinghouse, 44 B.R. at 791, that N.C. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
The case, DirecTV, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am
The case, DirecTV, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
* * * In 2002, after my wife and I had sufficiently recovered from Bush v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:33 am
On the other hand, the lawyer representing the state interests experienced difficulty describing a "manageable" lawsuit and was peppered with questions by the court's traditionally more liberal Justices. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:51 pm
” You can read more about the Scalia v. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 7:09 am
Google and Twitter Inc., v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
Right-wing defenders of the administration are arguing for sweeping notions of federal power, including by relying on a broad interpretation of Arizona v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:03 pm
Mayo v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:53 am
It is often stated that the Lien Law is to be “liberally construed” so as to protect the rights of the contractors and workers who are the beneficiaries of the statutory scheme. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:54 pm
The New Jersey Appellate Division followed the principles and guidance of the federal Title VII jurisprudence, and the United States Supreme Court's decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 10:13 am
Four dissenting Supreme Court Justices warned last year that the majority’s decision in McGirt v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:03 am
Blaisdell or no, the Court for years continued to strike down many state laws that impaired contracts, and the justices of the Court’s liberal wing sometimes joined, as in Worthen v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
The case was Dearborn v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:51 pm
See Kijowska v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
The 4-1 ruling in Chisolm v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 7:40 am
Now, I love the feds and the environment as much as any card-carrying liberal, but in this case I just happen to think the conservatives were right and that the CAA gives the states the right to insist on their BACT determinations unless those determinations are unreasonable under state law. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 7:10 am
Do you want the Supreme Court to overturn Citizens United or Roe v. [read post]
