Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 741 - 760
of 26,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:00 pm
At the Supreme Court, the Justices decided Burwell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
By the Kean Miller State and Local Tax Team On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 2:54 pm
Phillips v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 12:24 pm
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:24 am
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 2:47 pm
On Friday, CAAF granted review of this issue, but ordered no briefs:WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THIS COURT'S DECISION IN UNITED STATES v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:32 pm
In McCarthy v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
As the Comptroller's determination — finding that Breslin was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of a light-duty assignment — is supported by substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Sweeney v DiNapoli, 88 AD3d 1051, 1051 [2011]; Matter of Murray v New York State Comptroller, 84 AD3d 1681, 1682-1683 [2011]; Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Roache v Hevesi, 38 AD3d… [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 10:32 am
In Daimler AG v. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 6:49 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 7:58 pm
The plaintiffs in Altria v, Good, 501 F. 3d 29 (1st Cir. 2007) alleged that Phillip Morris violated state laws prohibiting fraudulent misrepresentation in its false promotions and advertising for Marlboro and Cambridge Lights as "Light" with "Lowered Tar and Nicotine" when in fact the "Light" cigarettes would not deliver any less tar or nicotine to the smoker. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:18 am
"Finding that there was substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's determination that Petitioner was fit to return to light duty and that surgery was a reasonable and appropriate treatment the court ruled that as Petitioner failed to return to work for his light duty assignment, and did not undergo surgery, his GML §207-a benefits were properly terminated.In Schenectady Police Benevolent Association v New York State Public Employment… [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 1:20 pm
Co. v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am
After all, four years ago, in Rucho v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:54 pm
In light of our previous discussion, it seems amusing that Judges Baker and Ryan weren't present at the Southern University Law Center for CAAF's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:12 am
Although their particular proposals are untenable in light of the Founders' design, these critics are on the right track insofar as they identify the second of Missouri v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
