Search for: "State v. Nails"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,044
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2011, 5:14 am
The Wall Street Journal reports that Jay Lefkowitz of Kirkland & Ellis, who successfully argued that federal law requires preemption of state failure-to-warn claims for generic drugs, given the lack of discretion that such generics have, in Pliva v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:42 am
In McCurdy v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:35 am
By placing a judge in a courtroom the General Assembly is stating that it trusts this judge's discretion in the use of advisement powers. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:04 pm
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin may have added to the procedural complexity and uncertainty of Wisconsin postconviction law with its decision last week in State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:03 am
U.S., People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
In Crawford Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:15 am
Concepcion, which hammered a few more nails in the class action coffin, giving big corporations even more leverage to cheat their employees and consumers. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 11:38 am
The Supreme Court of the United States issued a long-awaited decision in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm
Righthaven v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:26 am
” (This is at least the second time that the Chief Justice’s dissents have channeled Ben Franklin’s nail-to-kingdom metaphor; he voiced a similar concern about bad farriers in Massachusetts v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Ward v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:06 am
"The case is Fox v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 3:43 am
In State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:40 am
See Oscar v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm
This was in the case of Sienna Miller v News Group. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
(On the Application of) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1388 (Admin) - read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s John Joliffe appeared for the Secretary of State the Home Department in this case. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 5:07 am
The more recent decision in Innovention Toys v MGA Entertainment (Fed Cir., Mar 21 2011) though perhaps less factually clear-cut also ruled that the art there cited was analogous. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
Sharma v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:47 pm
She lifted up the end of the handrail and saw that there were no screw or nail holes in the handrail [read post]
