Search for: "State v. Primes"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,724
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
Instead, the Court cited both the fact that the prime contract clause only discussed timing of payments and specifically stated that payments from Turner to subcontractors were to be in accordance with the subcontract documents. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 8:34 am
But see State v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:35 pm
.), British Prime Minister David Lloyd George, French Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau, and U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am
“…of a scale of not less than 1:25,000″. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
We have previously written about the impact of New Prime v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 4:22 pm
Spain), homophobic jokes (Sousa Goucha v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
In the first case, Weeks Marine, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 7:27 am
On March 26, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal the decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Canada v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 4:04 am
Billing for services were allegedly rendered to the patients from June 2007 through 2011″ (Zegelstein v Faust, Slip Op 31257(U), *2 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]). [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:34 am
In the recent decision of Laguna Construction Company, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 11:35 am
Switzerland said it was departing from its usual policy of neutrality because of 'the unprecedented military attack by Russia on a sovereign European state,' but expressed a willingness to help mediate in the conflict. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:01 am
She was a member of the 1st Sinn Féin delegation to Downing Street, residence of the British Prime Minister, in 1997.... 1898 (110 years ago today), in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
This duty does not require the state toinitiate a particular investigation; its obligations are met by ensuring that there is a suitable system in place.[2] However, in England and Wales, the traditional style of inquest, as considered in the case of R v HM Coroner for North Humberside and Scunthorpe, Ex p Jamieson,[3] is a significant means by which the state meets this obligation. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:10 am
It noted that the problem of deciding the Court’s temporal jurisdiction had been considered with varying results in previous cases, notably Blecic v Croatia (2006) 43 E.H.R.R. 48, Moldovan v Romania (2007) 44 E.H.R.R. 16, Balasoiu v Romania (App. no. 37424/97), 2 September 2003, and Kholodova v Russia (App. no. 30651/05), 14 September 2006. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 5:56 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 3:35 am
Frye and Lafler v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 9:58 pm
Bromfield v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:31 am
But Griffin was a criminal case and while at least four other circuits have applied its rule to the civil context, the Sixth Circuit declined to do so in Virtual Maintenance v Prime Computer, 11 F3d 660 (6th Cir 1993). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
At least one state court–before Uveges v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:50 pm
The case, Kline v. [read post]
