Search for: "State v. Rhodes"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2017, 7:34 am
Supreme Court’s Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The measure had been contentious in D.C. before it was sent out to the states—each house of the U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
How many states have done that? [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
North Carolina and Rhode Island had not ratified the Constitution, but significantly neither state rejected it. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 11:15 am
But in Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
While Florida Supreme Court Justices may not be aware of it, the readers of this blog know that appraisal rules vary from state to state. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 11:15 am
For example, the Federal Circuit upheld the District of Rhode Island’s decision of no willfulness despite the jury’s contrary verdict in Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:49 am
In Caetano v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:50 am
C.M. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 6:12 am
Pope Francis’s visit to the United States once again dominates Court-related news. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:10 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:03 am
Kempthorne Issue: Whether the Narrangansett Tribe may receive benefits under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 if the Tribe was not federally recognized on the date of enactment, and whether the Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act foreclosed the Tribe’s right to exercise sovereignty over land in the state. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
States and Territories, to access Rhode Island laws. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
Of states reporting personal property tax data, state reliance on personal property in 2017 ranged from 1.79 percent to about 29 percent of state property tax bases. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm
Further, even after recreational marijuana was legalized in the state in 2016, a 2018 California Supreme court ruling in Ross v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 6:20 am
Rhode Island, cert den. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
United States, No. 11-94. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
And he also had the redoubtable Nathalie Lieven QC and David Blundell acting for EM (presumably pro bono, although this isn't stated). [read post]
