Search for: "Strickland v. State" Results 741 - 760 of 918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
Vance Spath called to order the military commission in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
Short-form indictments for statutory sex offense and indecent liberties using identical language for each charge and joined for trial were not defective State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:48 am by John Elwood
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:03 am by Russ Bensing
  Doesn’t have anything to do with the cases from last week — or indeed the cases from the last five years — but I was researching the question of whether a metal pole can be a deadly weapon for purposes of a felonious assault last Friday, when  I ran across State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am by John Elwood
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
And while the Sunflower State won big this week in Kansas v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
Correll Issue: Whether the court of appeals properly applied the prejudice standard set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 8:40 pm
As the State's opposition in Brewer correctly notes, there is a dynamic tension between the cornerstone of Texas capital jurisprudence, Jurek v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
United States silly-case-name award. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:46 am by John Elwood
Texas, which were amply supported by the habeas and trial records, and whether the Texas court disregarded the Supreme Court’s express guidance for conducting a prejudice analysis pursuant to Strickland v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 2:45 am
Strickland rejected that last week. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am by John Elwood
Texas, 18-9674 Issue: Whether the standard for assessing ineffective assistance of counsel claims, announced in Strickland v. [read post]