Search for: "Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United States"
Results 741 - 760
of 874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive… [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
“On appeal, the Applicant must persuade the BPAI of reversible error. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am
But it was not a claim filed by Oppenheimer, but a claim referred to the CCB from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
” Citing its 2010 decision in Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 8:31 am
” Citing its 2010 decision in Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:45 am
Intellectual Science and Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Dilanchian), Review of National Innovation System: (IP Menu News) Bahrain Bahrain gives itself longer to refuse Madrid marks: (I [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:40 am
Supreme Court hears arguments on the privacy of personal e-mails on work computers - http://bit.ly/6sVCmiPrivilege in Private E-Mail at Work - http://kuex.us/455eSaving E-Discovery Money with Hit by Term Reports http://bit.ly/6F4AGTSeventh Circuit Adopts Set of Principles and Standing Order for Handling E-Discovery - http://kuex.us/456cThe Cost of Silence in a Social World - http://kuex.us/4909The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency: Spy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 11:03 am
The BOLO listings were either a lazy or targeted response (depending on who you talk to) to the significant uptick in tax exempt applications following the Supreme Court ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
" No, said the California Supreme Court: [W]e are not persuaded that imposing a duty on landlords to withhold rental units from those they believe to be gang members is a fair or workable solution to [the] problem [of gang violence], or one consistent with our state's public policy as a whole. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:01 am
Of course, the effectiveness of purported limitations on warranty liability varies from state to state. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
The term fair use originated in the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 1:33 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run on June 1, 2008:
Sorted by Chapter Law Number. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
: Industries Ltd v Dynamic Supply Pty Ltd: (IP Down Under)BrazilIFPI raids hundreds of internet cafes: 600 cops, one arrest: (Ars Technica)CanadaInterlocutory injunctions in trade mark cases: a difficult test to meet: CMAC Mortgages v Canadian Mortgage Expert Centre and CanadaHyundai Autov Cross Canada Auto Body Supply: (Canadian Trademark Blog), (coverage of Hyundia - IPblog), Privacy Coalition warns on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Wikinomics on… [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:38 am
On 14 July 2023, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by the Chinese state broadcaster’s international division, China Global Television Network (CGTN), against a £125,000 fine handed down by Ofcom, Star China Media Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Office of Communications [2023] EWCA Civ 843. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am
Although rationalized as a tax on some of the world’s largest technology companies, most of which are headquartered outside Maryland, a significant share of the economic incidence of a digital advertising tax would be borne by in-state businesses in the form of higher advertising costs. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:49 am
- http://bit.ly/MWxSL5 (iTechPost) Apple v. [read post]
