Search for: "T " Results 741 - 760 of 881,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The appellant refers inter alia to decision T 473/08 (by a different BoA) to point out that “a non-technical problem can have a technical solution”. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 12:48 am
In other decisions, the drawing in a patent were considered “quite” precise (T 1200/05) or akin to construction drawings (T 422/95). [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 5:00 am
”Since J.C. wasn't able to rebut the franchisors’ showing that they “lacked the requisite control over the manner in which Plaza Toyota serviced vehicles,” the AD2 thought the denial of the dismissal motion was an error and reversed; dismissing all claims and cross-claims that had been asserted against those defendants.Interestingly, the failure to introduce a copy of the dealership agreement didn’t negate the franchisors’ entitlement to… [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:02 am
T-bone collisions, also referred to as side impact or broadside crashes, are a common type of accident in Citrus County. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:40 am by Tamera H. Bennett
Simply putting a phrase on a t-shirt does not convey to the world that you are using the phrase as a trademark or brand. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
This was clear from decisions T 305/08 and T 452/05. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:24 am by Nico Cordes
Reference in this regard was made to decision T 613/10 (see the decision under appeal, reasons 3.1).2.3 The opposition division concluded that the requirements of Rule 76(2)(c) EPC were not met (see reasons 4).The board's position3. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:25 am
Louis found that often women aren’t helping others break through the glass ceiling. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
T 361/08 [13]).The admission of a request for reimbursement of further search fees that had been paid would lead to the Board dealing with the corresponding questions for the first time in appeal proceedings or remitting the case to the first instance (A 111(1)). [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
A kind colleague has informed me that Board 3.3.01 has now issued its final decision in case T 584/09.In this case the opponent filed an appeal after the Opposition Division had maintained the patent in amended form.In its first decision, dated February 3, 2011, Board 3.3.01 revoked the patent.The Enlarged Board of appeal (EBA), in its decision R 21/11, set aside the decision because the deciding Board had not been aware of a request (to admit expert opinion D27) and, therefore, had ignored… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, a transfer of the party status in the course of the proceedings can only be effective when the Board has been requested before the Board to register the legal succession and when the corresponding evidence has been filed (see T 19/97 [5]) – something that could only be done by the [opponent].[7.3] Pursuant to A 104(1) EPC 1973 each party to the opposition proceedings shall meet the costs it has incurred unless a different apportionment of costs is ordered “for reasons… [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 1:32 pm by Daily Record Staff
Maryland 529, formerly College Savings Plans of Maryland, announced Friday that T. [read post]