Search for: "TARGET CORPORATION v. US "
Results 741 - 760
of 2,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 3:41 am
These possibilities highlight possible corporate climate change-related enforcement and liability exposures. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
These rules ban campaigns from using ChatGPT to create materials targeting specific voting demographics, a capability that could be abused and spread disinformation. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:36 am
Note: The investors discussed in this Part V and in prior and subsequent parts of this series are listed in no particular order. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:33 pm
DATA TARGETING, INC., et al., Respondents. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
US Congress, lobbyists renew patent reform sl [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 1:19 am
Perhaps it was inevitable that the heightened consciousness of the #MeToo movement, and the willingness of female complainants to come forward, should find its way into the arena of minority shareholder oppression, leading to a ruling earlier this month in Matter of Straka v Arcara Zucarelli Lenda & Assoc. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm
” The complaint alleges that the company was an “attractive target” for cybersecurity attacks because the ubiquity of its software means that “hackers can use the Company’s software to gain privileged access to SolarWinds’ clients’ systems. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:24 am
The rule is that a trademark not alone used by a complainant undermines its contention that it was targeted by the respondent. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IP finance) Australia Trade mark use: We need a more balanced solution – FCA decision in Alcon v Bausch & Lomb (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCA on trade marks as security for costs: Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt (ipwars) Minister for Innovation decides not to change regulatory regime for books – publishers keep territorial exclusivity (LawFont) (Managing Intellectual Property) Non-English language publications may not be… [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 12:15 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 3:23 pm
Consistent with that theme, many governments are paying more attention to the national security implications of corporate transactions involving foreign investors (e.g. the Huawei/5G network debate). [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:29 am
Filed under: corporate crime, corporate governance, law school [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:27 am
DZ Reserve v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
The nonmovant must go beyond the pleadings and use affidavits, depositions, interrogatory responses, admissions or other evidence to establish a genuine issue. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
See Harisiades v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
Targeting is a legal concept in the UK and the EU which turns on the facts.The judge summarised Lifestyle’s case on targeting as follows:amazon.com effectively targets the world, not j [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
The importance of data to the remedial project and the forms of its use is also considered.Introduction. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Typically, these cases involve a defendant who is an employee or agent of a company undertaking a takeover, and the defendant buys stock in the target of the takeover, using information that he learned from his client, the prospective bidder. [read post]
