Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 741 - 760
of 4,357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2018, 8:25 am
The three-year time limit for filing a paternity challenge under the Revocation of Paternity Act (RPA) does not apply when the presumed father raises the issue in a divorce action, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled.In Taylor v Taylor(Docket No. 336193), a published decision, the Court of Appeals was asked to determine whether a paternity challenge always has to be brought within three years of the child’s birth pursuant to MCL 722.1441(2). [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 8:04 am
In Harrington v. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 1:07 pm
From Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:22 am
Liquidation of sick leave benefits upon retirementO’Brien v Deer Park UFSD, USDC, EDNY, 127 F. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 12:25 am
(Hat tip to guest blogger Dave Taylor of Taylor Brand Group). [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:54 am
Three Rivers Archery Supply Inc et al v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:31 am
"Taylor portrays the Court's gag on law clerks -- which has slipped now and then, most recently in notable fashion when David Margolick, Eugenia Peretz and Michael Shnayerson reported on Bush v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 12:00 am
In the case of Moses Taylor Foundation v. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Marjorie Taylor Greene https://t.co/PbVidgPDgm 2022-01-02 U.S. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
In a Decision dated November 3, 2016, in the case of Taylor v. [read post]
Supreme Court Asked to Review Decision on Opting Students Out of Instruction on Gender and Sexuality
16 Sep 2024, 4:10 am
Taylor, (Sup. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 3:00 am
In Taylor Morrison Services, Inc. v HDI-Gerling Am. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Laura Taylor Swain this week in John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 10:56 pm
The Full Court of the Federal Court’s decision in Killer Queen LLC v Taylor [2024] FCAFC 149, delivered last week, is one such case. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:00 am
Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:26 am
Prohibited subjects of arbitrationMatter of County of Chautauqua v Civil Serv. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 8:49 pm
In Lugo v Ameritech, 464 Mich 512 (2001) Justice Taylor overuled more than 25 years of caselaw and adopted the "open and obvious" doctrine in all slip and fall cases in Michigan. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 10:31 am
Real property — Foreclosure — Motion to intervene This appeal arises out of foreclosure proceedings as to a property located at 9005 Forest Oaks Road in Owings Mills. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 5:08 pm
Although protection of privacy in Australian law has evolved considerably since the stance taken in Victoria Park Racing and Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor that “any person is entitled to look over the plaintiff’s fence to see what goes on in the plaintiff’s land. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 3:34 am
Yes, a recent case – Taylor v. [read post]
