Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Doe" Results 741 - 760 of 2,256
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2018, 11:51 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Florida’s workers’ compensation system has two distinct time bars for filing petitions to seek benefits. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 9:50 am by Eric Goldman
More than a thousand miles distant from Tampa, the Missouri bar sells no food or alcohol in Florida for at least the reasons that the bar lacks the licenses necessary to sell food and alcohol in Florida and maintains a presence only in O’Fallon, Missouri. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In late November 2009, plaintiff spent a week in a hospital in Florida due to severe lower back and hip pain.While in Florida, plaintiff also took on various odd jobs in addition to her legal work. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States, and, if so, whether a conviction for burglary of a dwelling under Florida law qualifies as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
United States, and whether a conviction for burglary of a dwelling under Florida law qualifies as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am by Aurora Barnes
McDaniels 17-682 Issues: (1) Whether a one-sentence allegation of fact in the background section of a prisoner’s state court brief can be sufficient to exhaust a novel and complex federal constitutional double jeopardy claim; and (2) whether it is unreasonable to conclude that double jeopardy does not bar retrial, when the Supreme Court has repeatedly indicated that double jeopardy does not apply if the trial court lacks the power to enter a verdict. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
McDaniels, 17-682 Issues: (1) Whether a one-sentence allegation of fact in the background section of the prisoner’s state court brief for appellee is sufficient to exhaust a novel and complex federal constitutional double jeopardy claim; and (2) whether it is unreasonable to conclude that double jeopardy did not bar retrial, when the Supreme Court has repeatedly indicated that double jeopardy does not apply if the trial court lacked the power to enter a verdict. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 7:58 am by Amy Howe
Editor’s note: An earlier version  of this post ran on January 22, as an introduction to this blog’s symposium on Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]