Search for: "The State v. Clark"
Results 741 - 760
of 3,487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 5:41 am
See also State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 10:24 am
” Under United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained DCAS's denial of Petitioner's FOIL requests and, citing Matter of Oustatcher v Clark, 217 AD3d 478, opined that DCAS's rejection of the Petitioners' FOIL request was not "affected by an error of law".Observing that Supreme Court had improperly ordered DCAS to produce information possessed by a different agency, the Financial Information Systems Agency [FISA], the Appellate Division explained that FOIL… [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained DCAS's denial of Petitioner's FOIL requests and, citing Matter of Oustatcher v Clark, 217 AD3d 478, opined that DCAS's rejection of the Petitioners' FOIL request was not "affected by an error of law".Observing that Supreme Court had improperly ordered DCAS to produce information possessed by a different agency, the Financial Information Systems Agency [FISA], the Appellate Division explained that FOIL… [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Lords Phillips and Clarke felt they could, and that a broad and progressive interpretation should be applied to strip states of immunity for executory as well as adjudicatory proceedings. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 7:08 am
Oral argument for Kennedy v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:42 am
They must now live with that choice and can benefit only under the protection of a patent, not that of a trademark Decision- 7 Cir – GP v Kimberly Clark// [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:18 am
Law Lessons from DEBORAH DOLL V. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:21 am
People of the State of Illinois v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:40 am
Windsor in United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:24 am
Breakdown of Clark v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:45 am
The case is Konowaloff v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am
HHJ Clarke also found that evidence provided by customers - who stated that they considered Wenman to be the ‘Archangel Alchemist’ - was valuable evidence of reputation or goodwill.Despite it being apparent that Wenman was more focused on growing her business by word-of mouth, through appearances in person and through her website, HHJ Clarke said it was instead to be queried whether Wenman had used the signs in the course of trade on a sufficient scale to… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:44 am
See State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:36 am
The current law is now stated in the Equality Act 2010 but the issues in this appeal remain pertinent and are not affected by the revocation of the Regulations. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 1:12 am
The United States Supreme Court in Chaidez rejected the reasoning of the SJC in Clarke and found that Padilla only applied to prospectively. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
In Clark v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
