Search for: "Thomas v. Jones" Results 741 - 760 of 953
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2010, 6:33 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Tereshko issued a severance Order in the Post-Koken case of Thomas v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:55 pm by Adam Thierer
Judge Richard Posner used similar logic when penning the 7th Circuit’s 2001 decision in American Amusement Machine Association v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
-k Pending Executions May 25 John Alba* (Tex) 27 Thomas Whsenhant* (Ala) June 2 George Jones* (Tex) 10 John Forrest Parker* (Ala) 10 Richard Nields* (Ohio) 15 David Lee Powell* (Tex) 17 Jeffrey Matthews* (Okla) 18 Ronnie Gardner* (Utah) 30 Jonathan Green* (Tex) July 1 Michael Perry* (Tex) 13 William Garner* (Ohio) 20 Derrick Jackson* (Tex) Stays May 4 Stacey Eugene Johnson* (Ark) 19 Marlon Duane Kiser* (Tenn) 20 Richard Lee Tabler*(Texas) Executions May 12 Kevin Varga (Texas) 13… [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, Sullivan v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm by Adam Schlossman
Eugene Volokh briefly reviews past ABA ratings for Souter (“well qualified”), Thomas (“qualified”), and Roberts (‘well qualified”) At the WSJ Law Blog, Ashby Jones turns to the question of a possible successor to Kagan in the SG’s office. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am by Erin Miller
 At the Washington Post, Michael Shear and Robert Barnes report on Kagan’s comments on Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:51 am by Erin Miller
Jonathan Siegel at PrawfsBlawg notes that Bilski v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
The next body of cases involves less traditional alignments among the Justices – generally, the Court’s left (Stevens, Ginsburg, and Souter) and right (Scalia and Thomas) wings joining together to form a five-Justice majority. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Adam Thierer
As I’ve mentioned here previously, PFF has been rolling out a new series of essays examining proposals that would have the government play a greater role in sustaining struggling media enterprises, “saving journalism,” or promoting more “public interest” content. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 7:06 am by Anna Christensen
Looking back at Tuesday’s ruling in Jones v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:48 am by Erin Miller
Tuesday’s ruling in Jones v. [read post]