Search for: "Tom Goldstein"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,071
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2007, 10:06 am
The post by Tom Goldstein explains in more detail than we can comprehend why Chief Justice Roberts did not mislead the Senate when he answered Senator Leahy's question about the problem of granting cert but not a stay of execution. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 11:00 am
AG Nickles said yesterday that a team of lawyers helping with the case — including iPhone expert Tom Goldstein of Akin Gump and Walter Dellinger of O’Melveny (and Duke Law) — would remain on board. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 9:24 pm
Pete Times edit, PolitickerNJ, NJLJ] The Amiable Nancy (1818), admiralty case that could prove crucial precedent in Exxon Valdez punitive appeal, has nothing to do with The Charming Betsey (1804), key precedent on international law [Anchorage Daily News; Tom Goldstein/Legal Times] "First do no harm... to your attorney's case" [Cole/Dallas Morning News via KevinMD] Probers haven't come up with evidence of more than middling tiger-taunting, and attorney Geragos… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 1:58 am
In touting the site's heavy traffic today, at around 100,000 unique visitors, the site's head honcho, Supreme Court advocate and master analyst Tom Goldstein, made me focus on what a niche product this is. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:05 pm
Tom Goldstein believes it likely that there will be an additional day in the term to issue opinions, as well. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 4:23 am
"Once people make it to the Supreme Court, we don't tend to lose them," said Tom Goldstein, who heads the Supreme Court practice of Washington law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.The case had been watched across the country and potentially could have affected thousands of criminal defendants and a growing backlog of cases awaiting resolution of the issue. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:23 am
At this blog, Tom Goldstein provides an extended analysis of why Jones is less of a pro-privacy case than many initially reported, and why the opinions “may be the result of extremely savvy tactical moves by four members of the Court. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:15 am
Tom Goldstein explains what all of this means at SCOTUSblog: "What you can learn from opinions regarding the denial of certiorari." [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 11:39 am
Appeals Court Judge Edward Prado, Texas Supreme Court Justice Eva Guzman, and nationally recognized defense attorney Gerald Goldstein. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 9:24 am
I served as a "Justice," along with Tom Goldstein and a number of current and former federal judges. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:13 am
My post prompted this comment from Tom Goldstein: For what it’s worth, I think that the development of the Bar probably points in both directions, but not for reasons related to the lawyers’ mixed incentives. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 3:00 am
National/Federal Paul Weiss Chair Says Deal with Trump Adheres to Firm’s Principles DNyuz – Matthew Goldstein, Jessica Silver-Greenbergm and Ben Protess (New York Times) | Published: 3/21/2025 The chairperson of Paul Weiss sought to reassure employees at the giant law firm that the deal it reached with President Trump was consistent with principles the firm has long stood by. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 7:04 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:18 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am
Coverage comes from Tom Goldstein at this blog, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News, Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Jonathan Stempel of Reuters, David G. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
