Search for: "Treat v. White"
Results 741 - 760
of 2,600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
Payment had been held to cover situations other than cash, cheque or bank transfer in White v Elmdene Estates Ltd [1960] 1 QB 1, [1960] AC 528, where an obligation to give a £500 discount on a sale associated with a tenancy letting had been found to be payment of a premium. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 4:31 am
Payment had been held to cover situations other than cash, cheque or bank transfer in White v Elmdene Estates Ltd [1960] 1 QB 1, [1960] AC 528, where an obligation to give a £500 discount on a sale associated with a tenancy letting had been found to be payment of a premium. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:19 am
“That the murder of black victims is treated as less culpable than the murder of white victims provides a haunting reminder of once-prevalent Southern lynchings,” Justice Stevens wrote. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:30 am
In the leading 1979 case of Parklane Hosiery v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:14 am
As part of any services agreement, labor suppliers should explicitly represent that they are treating their workers as employees, and not as independent contractors. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 10:19 am
Diaz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:31 am
Behrend and Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:37 am
Scott and White Memorial Hospital and Scott, Sherwood, and Brindley Foundation v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:03 am
But, doubtful readers, rest assured that Terry v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 8:14 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada described this in Pacific National Investments Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 2:41 am
White, 81 U.S. 511. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am
Cardwell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 11:41 am
From today's press release, by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression:, about Palsgaard v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 10:06 am
Yap In Rollins v. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Once again, a Justice Dollinger opinion, here in Messsinger v. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 3:41 pm
Here's a new outrageous one, MacLennan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 2:35 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Green v. [read post]
