Search for: "UNITED STATES v. FRANCE"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2016, 11:14 am
In Madey v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
THE CAPTAIN REPORTS: ELECTION DAY 2016 ...............PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES .......DONALD TRUMP ELECTED AS THE 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATESHistoric, unprecedented, shocking, and clearly the biggest upset in American political history. [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:49 am
Similarly, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg emphasized that the United States has a treaty obligation under Article V to defend its allies in Europe from foreign aggression, noting that Article V has only been invoked following the 9/11 attacks. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
France The French Court of Appeal has ordered Laure Pora, formerly president of the Paris branch of the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP), to pay &e [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
On 27 October 2016, the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction of Sun journalist Anthony France for assisting a police officer to commit the offence of misconduct in public office. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:24 am
Born in 1882, Fujii had immigrated to the United States from Japan in 1903. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:44 am
A series of creepy clown sightings across the United States has caused a wave of hysteria, forcing police and schools to scramble to contain spreading jitters. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 8:21 am
For example, France’s amicus brief in Morrison v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
“Denial“, a film based on Deborah Lipstadt’s book of the 2000 libel trial, Irving v Penguin Books and Lipstadt (see Gray J’s judgment, [2000] EWHC 115 (QB)) has been released in the United States. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 7:39 am
Union with the United States would make some sense. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 2:01 pm
Because the District Court granted the petition as to A.D., it instructed the District Court to order that A.D. be returned to the United States forthwith. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:49 pm
Heald, Christian Libertarianism and the Curious Lack of Religious Objections to the Patenting of Life Forms in the United States, (September 29, 2016).Engy Abdelkader, A Comparative Analysis of European Islamophobia: France, UK, Germany, Netherlands and Sweden, (UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law, Vol. 16, 2016).G. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:15 am
The Ninth circuit quoted the United States v. 594,464 Pounds of Salmon, More or Less case, which must be one the best names ever for a case. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am
Shifting our review to the United States, Justice Sonia Sotomayor read the Declaration of Independence for Heritage Day at the Oysterponds Historical Society in Orient, New York. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:23 am
Any doubt on this issue is resolved by the CJEU decision in Solvay v Honeywell which provides a clear analogy. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 1:03 am
Generally the answer is no, but there are some countries such as France where substitution is being embraced, probably relating to limited healthcare budgets. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 5:17 am
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 pm
The voting was as follows: In favour: Algeria, Benin, Burkina Faso, China, Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Morocco, Namibia, Pakistan, Philippines, Russian Federation, South Africa, Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Viet Nam Against: Austria, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Montenegro, Republic of Korea, Romania, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, United Kingdom of Great… [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:04 am
Ellie Wilson brings you the story.CJEU: "Flat-rate" reimbursement for legal fees must cover a significant part of the costs incurred by the successful party In Case C-57/15 United Video Properties, the CJEU held that while Article 14 Enforcement Directive does not prohibit flat-rate reimbursement of legal costs per se, it sets limits on how Member States can set the flat-rate. [read post]
