Search for: "US v. Holme" Results 741 - 760 of 1,388
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2014, 4:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Can make sense in individual cases even with good fair use defenses, but Rothman is concerned that courts incorporate these risk averse customs into their legal analysis—example from Ringgold v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Up to $8000 per work—the statute says up to $150,000, but a jury has awarded that in Capitol Records v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:42 am by Mark Tushnet
Oh wait -- we'll know when the Court hands down its decision in Bond v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:53 pm by admin
Pfizer sought to reverse the First Circuit’s decision by arguing that the decision ran afoul of the Supreme Court’s decision Holmes v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am by Matt Flyntz
Citrus Community College District, 131 P.3d 383 (Cal. 2006)), to the legality of fantasy baseball's use of player names and information (CBC Distribution & Marketing, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:17 pm
S. 388–395 (1987); Holmes, supra, at 288 (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment). [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm by Steven R. Morrison
 After all, as Justice Holmes said in Gitlow v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:23 pm by Kim Krawiec
Related Posts: Taxing Eggs: A Mini-Symposium Taxing Eggs: Introduction to Perez v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:11 am by Kim Krawiec
  That brings us to the question of the contract itself. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:31 am by Howard Wasserman
One colleague shared that in courses in which students write judicial opinions, the word limit is 2,358--the number of words in Justice Holmes' dissent in Abrams v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 2:42 pm by Kim Krawiec
This week, perma-Lounger Bridget Crawford (Pace) and special guest blogger Lisa Milot (Georgia) will join us in the Lounge for a mini-symposium on Perez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Holmes, Benjamin Cardozo, Louis Brandeis, and Robert Jackson, and Judge Learned Hand). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
  Specifically, the jury found that plaintiff Rhonda Holmes, a lawyer who briefly represented Love in disputes stemming from the estate of Love's husband Kurt Cobain, had not proved the degree of fault on Love's part necessary for Holmes to win the case. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:10 am by Eric P. Robinson
  Specifically, the jury found that plaintiff Rhonda Holmes, a lawyer who briefly represented Love in disputes stemming from the estate of Love's husband Kurt Cobain, had not proved the degree of fault on Love's part necessary for Holmes to win the case. [read post]