Search for: "US v. London"
Results 741 - 760
of 3,698
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2008, 7:24 pm
In Illinois v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:43 am
Bano, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2024) EWHC 654 (Admin) Waltham Forest owed Ms Bano the full housing duty. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
International Justice, Wild West v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
Neither is it sufficient to consider that the unauthorised use, reproduction or public communication of a work cannot rely on one of the narrowly interpreted exceptions in the copyright law itself, including the application of the so-called three-step test (art. 5.5 EU Directive 2001/29 of 22 May 2001). [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:49 am
SCOTTISH POLICE have now lost the ability to question suspects without their solicitor being present, after the UK’s Supreme Court in London finally issued its ruling today on the Appeal case of Cadder (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (Respondent) (Scotland), throwing out the practice in Scotland of being able to question suspects without a solicitor in attendance as being a violation of Human Rights laws.The background to the case : The Appellant was detained by the… [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:27 pm
As I have explained reform was effected to promote the use of London as a centre for dispute resolution largely based on contracts based on the common law as developed in the Commercial Courts of London. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Mitu v London Borough of Camden [2011] EWCA civ 1249In which the Court of Appeal splits over the proper interpretation of Regulation 8(2) of The Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999, while agreeing on the outcome in this case. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Mitu v London Borough of Camden [2011] EWCA civ 1249In which the Court of Appeal splits over the proper interpretation of Regulation 8(2) of The Allocation of Housing and Homelessness (Review Procedures) Regulations 1999, while agreeing on the outcome in this case. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
In this post, London-based barrister Ashley Roughton provides a more detailed review of that book.* JUST OUT - Molecular weights at the Supreme Court - Teva v SandozThe IPKat has already covered the UK litigation of Generics (t/a Mylan) v Yeda/Teva, in which a patent that covered glatiramer acetate was held valid even though the claims specified a particular molecular weight range without specifying what method was used to measure that weight… [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 6:56 am
City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), the majority took great pains to establish that the taking of Mrs. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:09 pm
Fran Unsworth told Mr Justice Mann at a High Court trial in London that the BBC had a responsibility to report but also to be sensitive. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 3:11 pm
The English Patents Court recently handed down a decision granting Novartis a preliminary injunction to prevent infringement of its second medical use patent protecting sales of its breast cancer drug everolimus (marketed as Afinitor) - Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Limited v Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited [2019] EWHC 92 (Pat). [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
US Parole Comm Eastern District of Kentucky at London 09a0005n.06 Johnson Coal Company v. [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
US Parole Comm Eastern District of Kentucky at London 09a0005n.06 Johnson Coal Company v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 8:06 am
In Lozano v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:36 am
This member of the IPKat team attended the Consultation Event on the current draft of the Rules of Procedure of the Unified Patent Court that took place yesterday (3 September 2013) in London in the lovely offices of Bristows. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 7:00 am
"The monitoring will also provide us with the possibility to act should this become necessary. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Here is the language from Shaffer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 6:06 am
In Warman v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 11:24 am
(But see Hirel Connectors, Inc. v. [read post]
