Search for: "US v. Mills"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,818
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
It reminds us that it grants the writ of mandamus on the totality of the circumstances; no single factor was enough to stop this case in its tracks. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 8:30 am
This is what occurred in Seneca One Finance, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:43 am
As the First Circuit's case in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:38 am
See Sheetz of Del., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Discover Bank v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:48 am
One of the difficulties is that outstanding benefit must be determined in the context of the employer's normal business activities; an outstanding benefit to a small start-up may be run-of-the-mill for a global multinational.In the case in question, the invention related to technology used in glucose testing for diabetics invented by Professor Shanks whilst he was employed at Unilever. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 pm
As such, even recreational use outside of the workplace could have an effect on the workplace (Chaisson v Kellogg Brown & Root (Canada) Co (2008), 289 D.L.R. (4th) 95 (Kellogg Brown). [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:00 pm
See Siegel v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
A friend of ours, we'll call him “Anonymous,” let us know about the recent decision in Forman v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 8:17 am
In Pecore v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:48 pm
And that led us to find an older Weeks case that took a while to appear in “print,” Stephens v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
Sullivan, 376 U.S. at 279 n.20 (quoting John Stuart Mill, On Liberty 15 (1947)). [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:21 am
Mills Ranch, Wheeler County, TX, a .0375 overriding royalty interest …”. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:52 am
Nor could it have known for which goods Wenz used or intended to use the mark. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc.; Arias v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
The Supreme Court upheld the action.When in the now-celebrated case of Marbury v. [read post]
