Search for: "Under Seal 1 v. United States" Results 741 - 760 of 834
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2023, 5:13 am by INFORRM
State of Uttar PradeshDecision Date: July 18, 2022 The Allahabad High Court of the state of Uttar Pradesh in India held that the right to change one’s name is a facet of the fundamental right to freedom of expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
Cancer Research sued Barr for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on July 20, 2007. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[ii] Nearly one out of every 11 United States publicly traded companies faced a securities lawsuit in 2019. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 2:01 am by Editor
" Practice Directions I-XII Cases currently being heard/under deliberation: Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am by Barry Sookman
Equustek Solutions Inc., [2017] 1 SCR 82, arose from a lower court decision that ordered Google to block websites that were selling goods that violated the trade secrets of the plaintiffs. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
: Fabio Perini SPA v LPC Group & Ors (PatLit) Nude trademark battle between Stella McCartney and Nude Skincare heads for Chancery Division (IPKat) NZ tribes find Everton Football Club’s misappropriation of Haka culturally insensitive (1709 Copyright Blog) Pirate Party UK officially registered (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) Save £10 on your patenting costs - Trade Marks and Trade Marks and Patents (Fees) (Amendment) Rules 2009 (IPKat) Patents County Court:… [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 12:46 pm by John Floyd
  On August 18, 2017, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
As a delegate, he voted to nullify the resolutions and amendments to diocesan governing documents which had been approved by the most recent diocesan convention under Mark Lawrence, yet his wife saw no difficulty in sitting in judgment over the validity of those resolutions and amendments on appeal (pp. 115-17).He also voted to elect Bishop Charles vonRosenberg, who promptly sued Bishop Lawrence in federal court claiming that he, not Bishop Lawrence, owned the trademark and seals… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:58 am by Ken Lopez
Litigating for or against the United States is a special situation. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46)   Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:03 am by Chris Castle
  CFIUS concluded that the acquisition “threatens to impair the national security of the United States” and recommended divestiture. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Source/origin and control over quality is the core of TM and has special relevance when trying to figure out what rights the plaintiff is claiming to own; sponsorship/affiliation is of lesser importance, albeit still relevant; sponsorship/affiliation might be better handled under 43, which could have stronger guardrails; consider Lexmark as a case about 43(a), which the Court says it is, and not about 43(a)(1)(B) only. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 2:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  July 29, 2019:  Capital One issues a public announcement concerning the data breach, which affected approximately 100 million individuals in the United States and approximately 6 million in Canada. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:15 pm by Lydia Estep
United States, 492 F.3d 1309 (2007), and is sometimes referred to simply as the “Blue & Gold rule. [read post]