Search for: "United States of America v. Page"
Results 741 - 760
of 1,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2009, 4:49 pm
What a lawyer would glean from U.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:34 am
In Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege… [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Michael Knapp shared news that defendants in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:39 pm
Payments to Government OfficialsWith respect to the FCPA count, Bridgestone was charged with authorizing and approving corrupt payments to foreign government officials employed at state-owned entities in order to secure sales of marine hose in Mexico and other Latin America countries. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 10:21 am
The Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act does not apply to "actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 3:10 am
(See the earlier discussion of this case here) Hoping to leverage this thinking, TDM America LLC, a plaintiff of the United States Court of Federal Claims, sought to undo an earlier adverse Markman Order and summary judgment of non-infringement. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ICANN approves custom gTLDs: (Out-Law), (ipblog.ca), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Managing Intellectual Property), High-tech companies pool resources to fight trolls: (IAM), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) eBay fined €38.6M over counterfeit sales on their site:… [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:56 am
The United States of America was not founded to control. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
United KingdomMeechan v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:59 pm
Aside from the obvious lack of authenticity by displacing supermodels and celebrity influencers, there are potential legal issues that arise in the United States with respect to the use of digital models. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:29 am
Wade, decided in 1973, was a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:25 am
The case is Dunn et al. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:11 am
Other partners include the district's Title V/CSHCN program. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 6:33 pm
United States of America (Case No. 1:14-cv-01523-RCL), the Court agreed that the IRS could continue to require the use of PTINs for tax preparers. [read post]
