Search for: "United States v. Anthony" Results 741 - 760 of 2,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court ruled 5-4 that stock options are not taxable compensation under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Bursch, and Detroit lawyer George Washington in the affirmative action case of Schuette -v- Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm by Lesley Wexler and Anthony Ghiotto
We also identify broader concerns such as possible trans baiting; the declining role and influence of military lawyers; the mismatch of Secretary of Defense Hegseth’s warrior ethos and the kind of service members needed for modern conflicts; and the new leadership’s flawed conception of unit cohesion.I. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
The ImmigrationProf Blog is hosting an online symposium on United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:40 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Wickham, 382 U.S. 111, 116 (1965); whether the rule is subject to a kind of reliance that would lend a special hardship to the consequences of overruling and add inequity to the cost of repudiation, e. g., United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 10:33 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
The Supreme Court granted review to decide whether this violates the free exercise clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Tuesday on Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am by John Malcolm
United States, the court resolved an issue of keen interest to a limited niche of immigrants. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 2:48 pm
NOTE: The Supreme Court case set for argument on Wednesday, Sept. 9, Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that… [read post]